Understanding and interpreting raw data types in people practice
5CO02 – Evidence-based practice
This CIPD Level 5 video, part of unit 5CO02 – Evidence-based practice, explores how to interpret and analyse raw data types within people practice contexts. The content directly addresses assessment criteria AC 2.1, equipping you with practical skills to interpret analytical data using appropriate analysis tools and methods, whether working with quantitative numerical data or qualitative narrative feedback. You'll examine how to identify causes, effects, trends, patterns, themes and anomalies within process documentation, complaint records and performance data to inform evidence-based HR decisions. By watching this video, you'll develop the capability to extract meaningful insights from raw data that support organisational people practice improvements.
What this video covers
Covered in this video are the two primary data types that people practitioners encounter when working with evidence: quantitative data, represented by numerical metrics such as absence rates, time-to-hire figures, training completion percentages and turnover statistics, and qualitative data drawn from sources including exit interview transcripts, open-ended survey responses, focus group discussions and grievance records. The video addresses AC 2.1 of 5CO02 by focusing on what it means to interpret rather than merely gather these data types, with particular attention to the conditions under which a figure or a narrative account can be considered meaningful rather than misleading.
For quantitative analysis, the video covers reliability checks on data sources, the significance of response rates, and the importance of examining an appropriate time period before identifying trends. It also addresses statistical measures including the mean, median and standard deviation, and explains why each has a distinct role depending on the distribution of data and the presence of outliers — using salary data as a concrete illustration of when one measure may be more representative than another. The discussion of turnover figures introduces the question of contextual interpretation, including sector benchmarking and the relevance of which employee groups are leaving.
On the qualitative side, the video covers thematic analysis as a systematic method for identifying recurring patterns across narrative sources, and introduces the distinction between manifest content and latent content as a framework for reading beyond what respondents explicitly state. A concrete example involving how an employee describes a manager's availability is used to illustrate latent interpretation, and the relationship between qualitative findings and quantitative patterns — such as how return-to-work interview data might explain a measurable rise in absence — is examined as part of the broader interpretive process.
Assessment Criteria 2.1
With reference to a people practice issue, interpret analytical data using appropriate analysis tools and methods.
Indicative Content
Interpretation of raw data (quantitative - numerical and qualitative - narrative feedback) derived from the analysis, for example causes, effects, trends, patterns, themes, anomalies, further questions. For example, process documentation, records of errors, complaints, shortfalls, successes. Evidence relating to outcomes (tangible/intangible); evidence relating to new or unmet requirements.
What You'll Learn
Video covering: Understanding and interpreting raw data types in people practice
About 5CO02 – Evidence-based practice
This unit addresses the significance of capturing robust quantitative and qualitative evidence to inform meaningful insight and influence critical thinking. It focuses on analysing evidence through an ethical lens to improve decision-making and how measuring the impact of people practice is essential in creating value.
More 5CO02 Videos
Handling anomalies, evidence types, and generating actionable insights
AC 2.1 – With reference to a people practice issue, interpret analytical data using appro...
Methods for identifying patterns, trends, and causes in people practice data
AC 2.1 – With reference to a people practice issue, interpret analytical data using appro...
Understanding stakeholders and presentation formats
AC 2.2 – Present key findings for stakeholders from people practice activities and initia...
Using visuals and presenting data effectively
AC 2.2 – Present key findings for stakeholders from people practice activities and initia...
Working with HR data and communication principles
AC 2.2 – Present key findings for stakeholders from people practice activities and initia...
Evaluating Risks and Financial Implications
AC 2.3 – Make justified recommendations based on evaluation of the benefits, risks and fi...
Making and Presenting Justified Recommendations
AC 2.3 – Make justified recommendations based on evaluation of the benefits, risks and fi...
Understanding and Evaluating Benefits of Potential Solutions
AC 2.3 – Make justified recommendations based on evaluation of the benefits, risks and fi...
Start Learning for Free
Create a free account to access study guides and HR model videos. Upgrade to full features for just £8.99 per unit when you're ready.